June 2012 M T W T F S S « Mar 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Michael Baker
-
Recent Posts
- A View Through The Looking Glass: How Crimes Appear From The Immigration Court Perspective
- Seventh Circuit Upholds Warrantless Search of Cell Phones-USA v. Abel Flores-Lopez
- Is Immigration Good for America?
- Marriage Fraud Doctrines.
- Making a false tax return “involv[ing] fraud or deceit” when the loss to the government exceeds $10,000 is an aggravated felony.
Archives
Categories
Category Archives: Motions to Reopen
Bachynskyy v. Holder. 7th Cir. -IJ Warnings regarding voluntary departure are not retroactive
Petitioner, a Ukrainian citizen who entered the U.S. without inspection sought withholding of removal under the Convention Against Torture. The Immigration Judge stated that she was continuing the case for four months, but that if she decided before that date,”you … Continue reading
Bachynskyy v. Holder. 7th Cir. -IJ Warnings regarding voluntary departure are not retroactive to VD grants occurring before January 20, 2009
Petitioner, a Ukrainian citizen who entered the U.S. without inspection sought withholding of removal under the Convention Against Torture. The Immigration Judge stated that she was continuing the case for four months, but that if she decided before that date,”you … Continue reading
USCIS Issues Interim Guidance on Providing Information on Appeals and Motions to Reopen or Reconsider in Denial Notices; Seeks Comments
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has released to the public an interim policy memorandum (IPM) dated January 26, 2011, providing USCIS adjudicators issuing denial notices guidance on advising petitioners and applicants as to whether they may file a motion … Continue reading
Posted in Motion to Reconsider, Motions to Reopen
Leave a comment
Matter of MONGES-Garcia, 25 I&N Dec. 246 (BIA 2010)
BIA Finds No Conflict Between Regulation’s Time Limits on Motions to Reopen and INA § 242B(e)(1)’s Limit on Discretionary Relief. (1) The 90-day time limitation for filing a motion to reopen in 8 C.F.R. § 1003.23(b)(1) (2010) applies to motions … Continue reading
7th Circuit interprets "questions of law" for reopening cases, post-Kucana
Seventh Circuit Overrules Singh , Holds that 8 USCA § 1252(a)(2)(B)(ii) Bars Review of Decisions Regarding Motions to Reopen Kucana v. Mukasey, No. 07–1002, 2008 WL 2639039 (7th Cir. July 7, 2008) In Singh v. Gonzales, 404 F.3d 1024 (7th … Continue reading